The moment distribution method (not to be confused with moment redistribution) is a structural analysis method for statically indeterminate beams and frames developed by Hardy Cross. It was published in 1930 in an ASCE journal.[1] The method only accounts for flexural effects and ignores axial and shear effects. From the 1930s until computers began to be widely used in the design and analysis of structures, the moment distribution method was the most widely practiced method.
Contents |
In the moment distribution method, every joint of the structure to be analysed is fixed so as to develop the fixed-end moments. Then each fixed joint is sequentially released and the fixed-end moments (which by the time of release are not in equilibrium) are distributed to adjacent members until equilibrium is achieved. The moment distribution method in mathematical terms can be demonstrated as the process of solving a set of simultaneous equations by means of iteration.
The moment distribution method falls into the category of displacement method of structural analysis.
In order to apply the moment distribution method to analyse a structure, the following things must be considered.
Fixed end moments are the moments produced at member ends by external loads when the joints are fixed.
The flexural stiffness (EI/L) of a member is represented as the product of the modulus of elasticity (E) and the second moment of area (I) divided by the length (L) of the member. What is needed in the moment distribution method is not the exact value but the ratio of flexural stiffness of all members.
When a joint is released and begins to rotate under the unbalanced moment, resisting forces develop at each member framed together at the joint. Although the total resistance is equal to the unbalanced moment, the magnitudes of resisting forces developed at each member differ by the members' flexural stiffness. Distribution factors can be defined as the proportions of the unbalanced moments carried by each of the members. In mathematical terms, distribution factor of member framed at joint is given as:
where n is the number of members framed at the joint.
When a joint is released, balancing moment occurs to counterbalance the unbalanced moment which is initially the same as the fixed-end moment. This balancing moment is then carried over to the member's other end. The ratio of the carried-over moment at the other end to the fixed-end moment of the initial end is the carryover factor.
Let one end (end A) of a fixed beam be released and applied a moment while the other end (end B) remains fixed. This will cause end A to rotate through an angle . Once the magnitude of developed at end B is found, the carryover factor of this member is given as the ratio of over :
In case of a beam of length L with constant cross-section whose flexural rigidity is ,
therefore the carryover factor
Once a sign convention has been chosen, it has to be maintained for the whole structure. The traditional engineer's sign convention is not used in the calculations of the moment distiribution method although the results can be expressed in the conventional way.
Framed structures with or without sidesway can be analysed using the moment distribution method.
The statically indeterminate beam shown in the figure is to be analysed.
In the following calcuations, counterclockwise moments are positive.
The flexural stiffness of members AB, BC and CD are , and , respectively. Therefore:
The distribution factors of joints A and D are and .
The carryover factors are , except for the carryover factor from D (fixed support) to C which is zero.
Joint | A | Joint | B | Joint | C | Joint | D | ||||
Distrib. factors | 0 | 1 | 0.2727 | 0.7273 | 0.6667 | 0.3333 | 0 | 0 | |||
Fixed-end moments | 14.700 | -6.300 | 8.333 | -8.333 | 12.500 | -12.500 | |||||
Step 1 | -14.700 | → | -7.350 | ||||||||
Step 2 | 1.450 | 3.867 | → | 1.934 | |||||||
Step 3 | -2.034 | ← | -4.067 | -2.034 | → | -1.017 | |||||
Step 4 | 0.555 | 1.479 | → | 0.739 | |||||||
Step 5 | -0.246 | ← | -0.493 | -0.246 | → | -0.123 | |||||
Step 6 | [[ | 0.067 | 0.179 | → | 0.090 | ||||||
Step 7 | -0.030 | ← | -0.060 | -0.030 | → | -0.015 | |||||
Step 8 | 0.008 | 0.022 | → | 0.011 | |||||||
Step 9 | -0.004 | ← | -0.007 | -0.004 | → | -0.002 | |||||
Step 10 | 0.001 | 0.003 | |||||||||
Sum of moments | 0 | -11.569 | 11.569 | -10.186 | 10.186 | -13.657 |
Numbers in grey are balanced moments; arrows ( → / ← ) represent the carry-over of moment from one end to the other end of a member.
For comparison purposes, the following are the results generated using a matrix method. Note that in the analysis above, the iterative process was carried to >0.01 precision. The fact that the matrix analysis results and the moment distribution analysis results match to 0.001 precision is mere coincidence.
The complete shear and bending moment diagrams are as shown. Note that the moment distribution method only determines the moments at the joints. Developing complete bending moment diagrams require additional calculations using the determined joint moments and internal section equilibrium.